SPLC Insinuates Alex Jones, Infowars Mobilizing Armed Insurrection

By • Sep 21st, 2009 • Category: Articles

This is a followup to the article:
Vote for the wrong candidate, display the wrong bumpersticker, support the Constitution, and be labeled as a terrorist!

SPLC Insinuates Alex Jones, Infowars Mobilizing Armed Insurrection

After Infowars and Prison Planet reported on the Department of Homeland Security’s “rightwing extremism” report earlier this year and the story went mega-viral on the internet — and was subsequently picked up by the corporate media, often with the usual dismissive caveats — it was discovered the agency had based much of its “research” on reports generated by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) and the Anti-Defamation League. The SPLC was also instrumental in the Missouri Information Analysis Center’s report. The MIAC story went public after an anonymous source in the Missouri State Police provided Alex Jones with a report characterizing Ron Paul and Chuck Baldwin as extremists and their supporters as terrorists.

The SPLC has lately made a cottage industry out of maligning members of the patriot and consitutionalist movements. After it was discovered accused cop killer Richard Poplawski posted on Infowars, the SPLC and a handful of writers (in particular, Dennis B. Roddy of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette) attempted to forge a link between Poplawski and Alex Jones. As Alex Jones has pointed out on numerous occasions, Poplawski did indeed post on Infowars. It was not mentioned by the SPLC or the writers, however, that the comments posted on the site were critical or Jones, nor was it mentioned that Jones does not share Poplawski’s racist and antisemitic beliefs.

The ADL has posted similar articles on its website.

The SPLC has a double standard when it comes to comments on websites. In August, a comment attached to a libelous article on Alex Jones posted on the SPLC website declared that Jones and his ilk should receive “a lethal injection or a bolt of electricity,” in other words that they be executed by the state simply for espousing political viewpoints that some may disagree with. The comments were made on April 15th by a person calling themselves “Hawkeye”. The comments have remained on the SPLC website for nearly four months without being removed, notes Paul Joseph Watson.

The SPLC is determined to link Alex Jones and Infowars to terrorism and “rightwing extremism.” In the Fall, 2009, issue of the SPLC’s “Intelligence Report,” Larry Keller takes the SPLC agenda one step further. After a rather tedious and long-winded run-down of the so-called militia movement — fashioned as a domestic terrorist threat by the government and corporate media after the federal massacre at Waco and the murder of Randy Weaver’s family at Ruby Ridge — Mr. Keller warns against the “extremism” and putative racism of the COINTELRO operative Glenn Beck, CNN broadcaster Lou Dobbs, and former Nixon speechwriter Pat Buchanan.

However, the SPLC’s enmity is reserved for Alex Jones. Near the end of the article, Keller writes the following:

A good illustration of antigovernment Patriot movement paranoia was the reaction to a National Guard exercise planned for April in the little town of Arcadia, Iowa. The guardsmen had intended to conduct a four-day mock search for an arms dealer that would include patrolling the town’s streets, distributing photos of the fictional bad guy and knocking on doors of residents who agreed to participate in the drill.

Alex Jones, the radio host and conspiracy theorist, got wind of the plans and interviewed a National Guard official, setting off an avalanche of angry calls and visits to his website from people who feared the exercise was really about imposing a dictatorship or martial law on the country. “Tell them that ANY violation of your rights will result in a ‘Live Fire Exercise,’” one such person wrote on Jones’ Infowars.com website. “If they come, come loaded for war!”

That incident showed how quickly militia enthusiasts now mobilize, thanks to the Internet. The National Guard rapidly scaled back its planned exercise, although it denied that the deluge of complaints had anything to do with its decision.

The “exercise” in Arcadia, California, was a brazen attempt to portray gun owners and Second Amendment activists as domestic terrorists that pose such an ominous threat to local police as to require the participation of the National Guard. It also served to underscore the fact the Posse Comitatus Act is a dead letter and acclimate civilians to armed soldiers performing what should be considered police work. In the last year, soldiers have been deployed to perform police duties in California, Ohio, New York, Iowa, Wisconsin, and Kentucky. National Guard troops were present at the Kentucky Derby and the Boston Marathon.

Keller and the SPLC are insinuating that Alex Jones is actively mobilizing “militia enthusiasts” bent on violence against the government. Jones has repeatedly stated that he does not believe in violence and has denounced comments on Infowars and Prison Planet calling for armed insurrection and violence against police officers and soldiers. Infowars and Prison Planet both share an open posting policy and the only restrictions on the sites are related to direct threats and pornography.

“The sounds of violence are growing louder,” Keller concludes. In fact, the sounds of outrage with the federal government and the New World Order are getting louder. The SPLC invariably characterizes such disagreement as violence and shamelessly dredges up the most fringe element declarations and outrageous actions as indicative of the intent of the patriot, libertarian, and constitutionalist movements.

Article Written By: Kurt Nimo

-->

21 Responses to “SPLC Insinuates Alex Jones, Infowars Mobilizing Armed Insurrection”

  1. “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible make VIOLENT revolution inevitable” JFK quoting T. Jefferson. I think there is a quote by Thom Jefferson to the effect of

    The leaders of a country must be reminded from time to time of the right of the people to take up arms against tyranny. SO by SPLC criteria Thomas Jefferson and others are fomenting a violent revolution from their graves? Click on the name to see a SPLC Morris Sleeze video exposing how Times Mirror Corp provided the seed money for the SPLC social engineering operation. it is about 50min. in five parts. “Blinded by the Lies” Morris Dees and the Southern Poverty Law Center.

  2. Link to Part two on this post’s “Name (required)”

  3. The more steamy stuff from the accusations in the divorce papers are in part three, lots of teen boys I suspect watching this is why it has more views than the other parts… Link by clicking the Name (Required)

  4. “Those who make violent revolution impossible (after quashing peaceful revolution) usually are followed by those that implement genocide,”-”Techknoman” 9/09 (see also the JPFO- Jews for Preservation of Fire-arms Ownership video documentary DVD INNOCENTS BETRAYED, parts are on youtube, google video and other video servers sites.

  5. Technoman says:

    Part V-II: Commercial Contracts and the UCC (continued)

    When the original thirteen sovereign nations of North America declared and
    received independence more than 200 years ago, the World Power Brokers -
    comprised of kings, bankers, and merchants – lost a wealth of future commerce
    and profits from their previous Colony Franchises and Letters Patent. Since
    then, the WPB’s have continually strived and schemed to regain their control and
    ownership of the real American People.

    They have been the instrumental force behind the conversion of free American states into the corporate and commercial United States. They have founded their “takeover” on outright deceit and presumptions without a single outcry from the American People. However, those presumptions and implied contracts can be rebutted according to the legalities they themselves have set into place. It’s kind of like the old saying, “What’s
    good for the goose is good for the gander”.

    In order to get in the front door, they had to leave the back door open for their own protection in case they needed to escape. But who’s to say their servants can’t use the same back door
    to escape? The law says we can and the door has been left wide open. They simply
    cannot abolish the legal means of our escape unless they abolish the legal means
    that put them in power and control.

    Their entire plan backfires in their faces when the contract presumptions are
    rebutted by the same legal Rules and Procedures they have set into place. The
    only reason they have succeeded to this point is that the American People now
    live in a false complacency; happy and satisfied with their debt contracts for
    houses, cars, boats, airplanes, and much more. But, many of us know that this
    lifestyle is soon to change into a more realistic picture of actual and physical
    servitude and slavery. The debts must be paid. Not only is the U.S. Government
    broke, but so are the American People. Had aware informed Americans followed the
    principles of natural Laws as did the early settlers, they would not have found themselves in this position.

    There is no doubt that the World Power Brokers have been dangling the bait of debt/credit as a means to entice the common man to obtain material wealth without having to pay up front for it. Has any average American ever taken the time to think what would happen if the loans they now have were all “called in” for payment? Where will you house your family? How will you drive to your job? How will you purchase your food?
    “Can’t happen”, commented an ABA Lawyer reviewing this material. When we pointed
    out that any declared “emergency” by the bankrupt Federal Government voids the
    payment terms of all contracts and legally all debt becomes “due and payable at
    will”, he thought about it again and had to agree with us.

    Our premise for argument was that Roosevelt confiscated all the gold in 1933 just for that
    purpose, as well as the Uniform Commercial Code itself, which states: UCC 1-208 Option to accelerate at will.–A term providing that one party or the party’s successor in interest may accelerate payment or performance or require collateral or additional collateral “at will” or “when she or he deems herself or himself insecure” or in words of similar import shall be construed to mean that she or he shall have power to do so only if she or he in good faith
    believes that the prospect of payment or performance is impaired. The burden of
    establishing lack of good faith is on the party against whom the power has been
    exercised.

    Method of Rebuttal

    In 1988, the federal and corporate United States joined the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods which now governs contracts within its scope. According to international and universal (uniform) Contract Law, such as the UCC, a contract can only be valid if it follows all the Rules and Process of law that created it. One of the main elements or rules of contract law states that “all parties must understand the scope, nature, terms, and conditions of the contract”. Another main element states that “all parties must consent to the contract”. If it is not agreed to and there is no
    mutual consent, then there is no contract.

    Any purported commercial contract that fails to be entered into by mutual “good faith”, with full disclosure of the terms and conditions to both parties, and consent by all parties, is void ab initio (from the beginning).

    Whenever the elements of “good faith” disclosure and/or “consent” are missing, any contract can automatically be ruled null and void if the deceived or defrauded party enforces the Rules of Law. Once again, silence is default. If you say nothing, you have defaulted.

    UCC 1-203 Obligation of good faith.–Every contract or duty within this code
    imposes an obligation of good faith in its performance or enforcement.

    Were you aware of the implied and “presumed” contract between you and the Real
    Party of Interest, the owners of the Federal Reserve System? In all law and
    truth, it doesn’t exist, does it?

    UCC 1-201 Definitions– (31) “Presumption” or “presumed” means that the trier of
    fact must find the existence of the fact presumed unless and until evidence is
    introduced which would support a finding of its nonexistence.

    Were all terms and conditions disclosed to you at birth or any time since then?
    Of course not. Legally, once you rebut the presumption by affidavit for failure
    to disclose the terms and conditions or obtain mutual consent, the contract
    automatically becomes null and void. Such a contract as this, which has
    unlawfully bound the average American to it, is considered fraud or
    misrepresentation.

    For example:
    UCC 1-103 Supplementary general principles of law applicable.–Unless displaced
    by the particular provisions of this code, the principles of law and equity,
    including the law merchant and the law relative to capacity to contract,
    principal and agent, estoppel, fraud, misrepresentation, duress, coercion,
    mistake, bankruptcy, or other validating or invalidating cause shall supplement
    its provisions.

    As you can now see, the major flaw in all artificial governments and their
    “laws” is the absence of a genuine and legal agreement between the parties due
    to a failure to fully disclose, have a meeting of the minds, and lack mutual
    “good faith”. In their presumption that you have agreed to a bona fide contract
    with the government, you were never informed of the full terms and conditions of
    the purported contract.

    The reason this situation could exist in the first place is because of the fact that
    the American People have fooled themselves, lied to themselves, and failed to
    communicate among themselves. They have set aside natural law, which is the True Law of God, and replaced them with the laws of men. – The world of man’s laws and
    governments was brought about by the very people who are now the enforcers for the
    “system”. Since Lincoln’s War, Americans have lived in fear of speaking out against wrongs that they see taking place.

    According to the universal principles and foundations of contract law (See
    Background, Part I), in the absence of a genuine agreement, no contract exists.
    What does exist is nothing more than a presumption of contract based on the
    deceived party (you) having foolishly trusted in the government. Although fraud
    is unlawful, it is not illegal in artificial State rulership systems.

    Keep in mind, once again, that all governments are structurally fraudulent due to the
    origins of their artificial conception. Based on this premise of evidence, it’s an obvious fact that fraud must be “legal” as governments are able to judge themselves as legal in the first place. In other words, the existence of a government is a legality founded in fraud ab initio.

    Holder in Due Course – In Commercial Law, the ultimate owner of any “Document of Title” is known as the “Holder in Due Course” (HDC).

    He is the only one who possesses a valid claim to “title” whereby the goods or property are deliverable to him. By comparison, a technical “Holder” may legally possess a “Negotiable Instrument”, but he lacks the ultimate claim of “title” held by the HDC and is nothing more than a receiver and collector of payments. The HDC receives the delivery of the property; the Holder merely receives payment for the property.

    UCC 1-201 DEFINITIONS– (20) “Holder,” with respect to a negotiable instrument,
    means the person in possession if the instrument is payable to bearer or, in the
    case of an instrument payable to an identified person, if the identified person
    is in possession. “Holder,” with respect to a document of title, means the
    person in possession if the goods are deliverable to bearer or to the order of
    the person in possession.

    UCC 3-302 HOLDER IN DUE COURSE–

    Subject to subsection (c) and Section 3-106(d), the “holder in due course” means the holder of an instrument if:
    (1) the instrument when issued or negotiated to the holder does not bear such apparent evidence of forgery or alteration or is not otherwise so irregular or incomplete as to call into question its authenticity; and
    (2) the holder took the instrument
    (i) for value,
    (ii) in good faith,
    (iii) without notice that the instrument is overdue or has been dishonored or that there is an uncured default with respect to payment of another instrument issued as part of the same series,
    (iv) without notice that the instrument contains an unauthorized signature or has been altered,
    (v) without notice of any claim to the instrument described in Section 3-306, and
    (vi) without notice that any party has a defense or claim in recoupment described in Section 3-305(a).

    As stated earlier, your Birth Certificate is simply a warehouse receipt. Birth
    Certificates are bundled together and transferred or purchased in “bulk sales”
    under one or more of the provisions found in UCC 6-104 through 108.

    However, possession of your Birth Certificate was not taken by the government in “good
    faith” and the legal Holder (government) cannot “enforce the instrument free from all claims and personal defenses.” This means that whoever, or whatever artificial entity, is now acting as the purported “owner” of your Birth Certificate can, in legal reality, only be only a technical “Holder” of the “Negotiable Instrument” and can never be the actual “Holder in due Course”. Only
    you can be the HDC.

    The HDC is the most powerful position in any exchange of property or goods in
    commercial law. The allodial key to understanding this lies in whether you are
    or are not the HDC of your Document of Title of birth, the Negotiable Instrument
    to your legal existence. Once you see that you are the legal HDC to your own
    Title of Rights, your whole worldly life will change dramatically.

    You are then, once again, a sovereign with respect to anything of which you are the Holder in Due Course.

    This will make you the HDC of “yourself”, both the real biological man and the artificial persona. (“Person”). It will place you as the ultimate owner of all your earthly affairs and everything else concerning ownership of your legal life. When you really think about it, this is the “legal” means by which your physical being and your Spiritual being can join together in true Freedom and Liberty as they were meant to be.

    The “secret” to becoming the HDC is known as “Acceptance for Value.” Your Birth
    Certificate (Document of Title) is currently held by “unknown parties” who can
    never be the HDC of it. Only you, and you alone, can become the HDC. When your
    offer of “purchase” is made, title passes upon acceptance of the offer.

    The offer (your UCC-1) is accepted by the previous Holder (the government) when they
    record it in the State records for a fee payment (value). The “acceptance for
    value” is made by the government in accordance with two Rules of law: One, the
    fee paid for recording the instrument; Two, since it is recorded without
    objection, it is also accepted by their own conduct, both implied and direct.

    All that remains to do at this point is to give or show affidavit evidence of
    the exchange (a copy of your recorded UCC-1 Financing Statement with the State
    acceptance seal and certification). “Acceptance” and “offer” are the two
    mandatory elements to any legal contract in commercial law. “Acceptance” or
    “Acceptance for Value”, for the purpose of commercial law, is “acquiescence”.

    Look carefully at these definitions written by Canadian lawyer Lloyd Duhaime
    from Duhaime’s Law Dictionary:

    Acceptance. A contract is a legally binding agreement between two or more
    parties which starts with an offer from one person but which does not become a
    contract until the other party signifies an unequivocal willingness to accept
    the terms of that offer. The moment of acceptance is the moment from which a
    contract is said to exist, and not before. Acceptance need not always be direct
    and can be implied by conduct.

    Acquiescence. Action or inaction which binds a person legally even though it was
    not intended as such. For example, action which is not intended as a direct
    acceptance of a contract will nevertheless stand as such as it implies
    recognition of the terms of the contract. If I display a basket of fruit in a
    marketplace and you come by, inspect an apple and then bite into it, you have
    acquiesced to the contract of sale of that apple.

    Offer. An explicit proposal to contract which, if accepted, completes the
    contract and binds both the person that made the offer and the person accepting
    the offer to the terms of the contract.

    In this modern world, man’s laws dictate that there are only two classes of
    people in any legal proceeding. You are either a Creditor or a Debtor. When your
    “legal sovereignty” is established, you become the sovereign Creditor of your
    life and affairs. Every adverse party then becomes your Debtor. However, if you
    do not establish your legal sovereignty, you do not “own” yourself (your own
    title) as the HDC; you have no legal capacity; you have no “standing in law” to
    assert your Rights; and you will remain a permanent Debtor as you are now. As
    Debtor, you will always lose in every dispute or claim by the current “system”
    for “failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted”.
    __________________
    Reclaiming the legal ownership of your persona (straw man) acts as an “equitable
    estoppel” to any and all who come against you in commerce and law.

    equitable estoppel.An estoppel that prevents a person from adopting a new
    position that contradicts a previous position maintained by words, silence, or
    actions when allowing the new position to be adopted would unfairly harm another
    person who has relied on the previous position to his or her loss. (called also
    estoppel in pais). Source- Merriam Webster’s Dictionary of Law 1996.

    You must reclaim your legal Rights of title and ownership to your persona,
    which makes you the Creditor and absolute sovereign ruler of your “straw man”,
    if you fail to do this, then you will NOT be sovereign and you WILL lose every claim that is made against you.

    This is the reason why, if you ever think of hiring an ABA attorney to represent you
    in any legal proceeding in which you are “against the “system”, you must demand up front that he, in writing, make you the Holder in Due Course of the action. Since he legally cannot do this, the consequence is that you will lose if he “appears” for or “re-presents” you.

    The best any Bar(fly) attorney can do is make a deal with the system Creditor, which is a
    negotiated settlement of the money being claimed as damages. You must be the HDC
    to be able to ensure victory in all dealings with the government and the
    “system”.

    We conclude Part V with some Maxims for you to absorb:
    Quod initio vitiosum est, non potest tractu temporis convalescere– Time cannot
    render valid an act void in its origin.
    Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus– False in one thing, false in everything.
    Quae malasunt inchoata in principio vex peragantur exitu– Things bad in the
    commencement seldom end well.

    Quod ab initio non valet, in tractu temporis non convalescere– What is not good
    in the beginning cannot be rendered good by time.

  6. nighthawk says:

    Maybe the reason people have forgotten ( / don’t care?) is because
    stuff like this has been removed from TV:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5C6flyf_tw&feature=PlayList&p=7D05F2E62228AE48&index=0&playnext=1
    Watching the first 5 videos should jog a few memories.
    Watch the whole playlist but the first 5 really get the point across.

  7. I proclaim that all U.S. offices, officials and departments are now operating within a de facto status in name only under “Emergency War Power.”

    Our constitutional form of government was technically dissolved and replaced by a so-called “democracy,” a government in actuality being a socialist-communist order under a new governor for America.

  8. excerpt is from this link, paste or click Trafficant’s name
    www
    americanfreepress
    .net/html/forget_the_audit_200.html

    The Patriot/Militia/Montana Freemen and others have pointed out
    that those in office are in occupation of abandoned offices built on
    constructive fraud and defacto status going back to reconstruction
    that was actually not re-construction but construction of a more
    “indivisible” non-constitutional more federal central power.

  9. nighthawk says:

    This should concern you:
    inflation is actually another tax; invisible, never seen, but a tax just the same. I don’t know about you, but I always thought that a “contract” under common law is only valid if it involves an exchange of some “good and valuable consideration.”

    From the same link: http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/forget_the_audit_200.html
    as posted above.

    Does anyone else take the time to look at these issues???
    Or is only two or three of us (here on this board) concerned?

    I wouldn’t care to add more to these discussions, but people aren’t
    commenting on the issues… (fear maybe?)

    People would rather ignore the evidence that we have been converted
    into “HUMAN RESOURCES”? Is everyone blind???

    As soon as you go to Employment Services looking for a job you will
    see the sign above the door “DEPT FOR HUMAN RESOURCES”
    Same place where you go to receive the unemployment benefits,
    your money that you paid in BUT might not receive…
    Same building, Same sign “DEPT FOR HUMAN RESOURCES”.

    So you are “FREE” Eh?
    You seem quite sure of your “FREEDOMS”.
    In fact, You are sooooooooooooooooo sure of yourself and your beliefs
    that you have the gall to laugh at, and belittle us few whom are trying
    to warn you.

    I have had comments deleted when I have made too good a point;
    such a good point as to discredit the whole argument of the person
    whom I was trying to help.

    “WAKE UP! THE HOUSE IS BURNING DOWN AROUND YOU!!!”
    quoted from a deleted comment… I’m sure a few remember.

    We have already lost our freedoms.
    Shouldn’t a few more people wake up and try to get them back?

    It would be so nice just to be able to post a YouTube video in an article,
    as maybe a few folks who don’t care enough to follow the links and read,
    might just watch a video, or listen to a sound clip… Which Might;
    Just Might… get the main points across ::: Possibly inspiring a few
    more people to not only follow the links, and read the articles, but to
    do their own research ::: Then come back with fresh takes on the situation.

    I only wish that we were only pushing crazy “Conspiracy Theories”, but sadly
    enough, we aren’t. Nor do we have the time to sit around and imagine all of
    this stuff. I AM NOT a creative writer. I don’t know how to write fiction.
    I just publish my findings here sometimes, while at other times I republish
    parts of other peoples findings… linking their articles as the source, and as
    a starting point for those who might seek further information.

    I wish this stuff was all lies, But it Isn’t!
    Just open up your eyes and take a look around.
    The truth is staring you right in the face — Anywhere You Turn!!!
    With the exception of when you are at home with the doors shut
    and the curtains pulled… UNTIL they come and invade your home
    under the supposition of “helping you”.

    This thing is a beast so big that the average person can’t even begin
    to comprehend it, it’s size, purpose, or it’s affiliations.

    Commercial Government, Corporate Government, Independent Agencies(ORGs),
    Churches (no not all of them), Solicitors, Entertainment Industry, Etc… Etc…
    AND the list goes on and on! Did I even name the Telephone Companies?
    ( AT Least read that link from WIRED about the Telephone Companies )
    I had previously stated, back some years ago, that one of the former corporations
    providing telephone service in this area was missing a couple of “l”s from their name.

    I can’t even begin to start linking big corporations and big pharma into the mix
    without filling three or four servers full of information. There just isn’t enough
    room for it all here… BUT you can follow the simple links to other servers when
    you read my posts, comments, or tag-lines, and find them unbelievable.

    It don’t even matter whether you believe these things are taking place or not
    because THEY DO! The people who are enslaving us BELIEVE they can do it.

    It doesn’t matter if your an atheist and don’t believe in the devil, THEY DO!
    AND THEY ARE DOING his BIDDING!

    What is is going to take to make people understand???
    When are people going to WAKE UP! ???
    When are those who have awaken going to stand up and do something?

    Folks,
    We have already lost our rights.
    Our rights have been converted into privileges.
    Shouldn’t we at least try to get our rights back?

  10. Nighthawk says:

    Here’s my for what it’s worth.
    I think that most of the usual readers have been alerted to
    the “Who?”, “What?”, “When?”, “Where?”, and “How?” ; but
    have not been alerted to the “Why?”, thus, all of these works
    are accomplishing no more than any other media outlet.

    Does it sound too crazy to write “There are a small number
    of rich — inbreed — people who are trying to take over the
    world by reducing the population by 80%, and by keeping
    the remaining 15% of the population to serve as their slaves ” ?

    Is THAT so hard to write?

    Would it be too radical to write “, because nobody will put forth
    any effort to stop them!” ?

    Would it be illegal to write such things?

    Are the presses, even electronic presses, censored so badly
    that the underlying “Why’s” have to be left out of the reports?

  11. looking for 3 to maybe 5 percent or 6 percent could make it easier to foment the next Revolution to restore the organic republic of the several states, there is a small movement wearing shoulder patches saying “3 percent” a reference to the three percent of the aMERICAN colonists that fought off the world government at that time being the british royal monarchy empire of the 1770s to 1820s. THe american revoultion was over 50years in fighting and requires eternal vigilance to maintain so with billions of webpages and 5oo TV channels I am optomistic if there are 5 people in this whole county that are on the same page with this information (I suspect it is dozens more) Do you have any Idea what one or two “rambos” could do to this county/city/ region in a afternoon/night of infrastructure attacks? I am not gonna give any details save to say I heard a speech by G Gordon Liddy at MSU where he described what he knew how to do 25years ago and nothing has changed in that department, we have only become more dependant on such interconnected “modern” life easing devices.

  12. nighthawk says:

    Maybe ~90,000 could accomplish something
    seeing that it only took 44 men to enslave us.
    They did it slowly, one at a time over the last
    couple of hundred years, but they did it.

    If you like working with numbers, put that 3%
    on a county-wide level… ~30 men?

    I’d have to speculate that we have that many
    WW-II Veterans willing to make one last stand.
    That fact alone doubles the number and says
    we have ~60 good men county-wide.

    That number is an extreme low estimate if
    you look at all of the people who will fight
    for daddy and grandpa.

    BUT…
    More numbers than that are already locked
    up inside of camp jail and camp prison, and
    not because they are the types who should
    be caged up like an animal (who do exist),
    but people who have been raped by the system
    because the system has nothing better to do.

    All it takes is for a newspaper to print that you
    have been charged with something, and the
    majority of the people automatically assume
    that you did it, even before moot court day.

    Now there exists a camp fema without even
    the benefit of a moot court;
    Not only contrary to the constitution, but to
    the declaration of independence as well.

    I DON’T KNOW THE UNDERLYING WHY!
    I can fit bits and peaces together and suspect
    a few reasons why, but as far as knowing why, no.

    I do know that they are trying to brainwash our public servants
    through programs called “training” and “recert”.

    I do know that public servants are generally good people
    before the brainwashing and after they manage to shake it off.
    A few of them never wake up from the trance, while some have
    an immunity (a BS alert if you will) from the brainwashing;
    But… If you work with a group of people who have been
    brainwashed, then how long is it going to take you to become
    just as brainwashed as they are? if only from association, from and
    by hearing daily repetitions of the same things from your buddies.

    (a paragraph was here, but I was getting too far off topic)

    I KNOW our rights have been converted into privileges
    EVEN THOUGH they lie to you and say you have rights.

    I KNOW that there has to be a reason that we have been stripped
    from our unalienable rights, and I KNOW that the reason for this is
    so we will be easier for “THEM” (whomever “THEY” are”) to deal with us,
    but I DON’T KNOW Why, (at least not exactly why) they have been
    allowed to do these things (even though I know how they did it).

    Finally,
    There is no such thing as a political party.
    I don’t care what your voter registration says.
    The thing they call “Political Parties” is only
    a mechanism to split up the popular vote in
    the most important election… The Primary.
    Political parties are WRONG!
    You should be able to vote for the candidate
    of your choice during the PRIMARY election.

    Folks, There is a reason it is called the Primary Election.

    So if your not a part of the scam, you can’t vote in the Primary,
    and that is unconstitutional (in my opinion) since you have the
    (alleged) “right” to vote for the candidate of your choice.
    BUT YOU SIGNED THAT RIGHT AWAY WHEN YOU “REGISTERED”
    TO VOTE — BY JOINING A PARTY. What choice did you have?
    Doesn’t anyone else see something wrong with that?

    You can vote for any candidate you like AFTER THE PRIMARY!
    After the most important (the primary) election, it doesn’t make
    any difference (to “THEM”) whom you vote for.

    Can you tell me the Whys? …anyone?
    Hey, how about you sitting there reading this,
    can you give me the reason why this stuff is happening?

  13. Just saw part of NCIS L.A. edition tonight & the clintonistas are
    hard at Operation hollywood again demonising the militia (all able body men 16 to 45
    or 18 to 65 if a vet) not a surprise but the little short boss woman was full of
    vitrol for the paranoiac gun nuts she looks like a short Janet Reno with better clothes.

  14. We are told this guy was sent back to Israel but …
    Professor Moshe had called into a live radio show by Dr. A. True Ott, (explanation of Joseph Moshe’s call at 06:00) broadcast on Republic Broadcasting claiming to be a microbiologist who wanted to supply evidence to a States Attorney regarding tainted H1N1 Swine flu vaccines being produced by Baxter BioPharma Solutions. He said that Baxter’s Ukrainian lab was in fact producing a bioweapon disguised as a vaccine. He claimed that the vaccine contained an adjuvant (additive) designed to weaken the immune system, and replicated RNA from the virus responsible for the 1918 pandemic Spanish flu, causing global sickness and mass death.

    targetfreedom.typepad.com/targetfreedom/2009/11/microbiologist-kidnapped-by-fbi-warning-vaccine-is-bioweapon.html

    Sources tell us that Bar-Joseph Moshe made no threat against the President or the White House. He did not mention any bomb or attack. He then proceeded to inform the White House he intended to go public with this information. When he noticed men in suits in front of his house and feared that the FBI was about to detain him, he packed some belongings into his car and, him being a dual Israeli citizen, tried to reach the Israeli consulate located in close proximity to the federal building where the standoff took place. The FBI and the bomb squad prevented him from reaching it.

  15. establishment tries to eliminate its ideological foes by demonizing them as violent extremists

    http://www.prisonplanet.com/adl-attempts-to-pin-a-yellow-star-on-grass-roots-america.html

  16. SPLC is sure to be cranking up the boooga booga too, it is deja vu all over again from the Clintonista days, do you attend Sunday skool, read the bible, believe in the “idolatry of Geezues” well you should be on their lists! Lets all turn in those terrorists?

  17. pseudo says:

    I was always told that it is best to go with them and fight it out in court,
    but here is another perspective:
    http://www.constitution.org/uslaw/defunlaw.htm

    Note:
    I am only bringing this information to your attention.
    I AM NOT giving advice or suggesting anything.

  18. nighthawk says:

    Didn’t I hear the words Yahoo, Policy, Spying…’er something somewhere?
    Something about 900913 censoring searches… possibly recording them?
    Who, or what, is funding such projects?

  19. 1 self-sufficient voice on Fox news inside the Television show. He still features a actually hard immigration law quote. They managed to graduate on the Harvard Collage. Now he possesses his one Airwaves Show. He don’t similar to that Us leader.

  20. Ron Hewgley says:

    When I initially commented I clicked the -Notify me when new feedback are added- checkbox and now each time a remark is added I get 4 emails with the identical comment. Is there any method you can take away me from that service? Thanks!

Leave a Reply