Changing the story, are we?
By dhunley • Aug 26th, 2007 • Category: ArticlesSee how this goes, Dave? They keep changing their story; now it’s no big deal that Valerie was “outed”…it’s the “intent”.
And it’s like that with ALL their issues…Dan Rather’s memo, the recent fake soldier diaries, ALL of it is simply hogwash.
Every single issue they tout can be poked plum full of holes…yet they still go right on touting’em. Global warming…abortion…social security…universal health care…evolution…it’s ALL designed to control and harm mankind—and they can’t be honest about ANY of them.
Please don’t be fooled by their stated “concern” for the poor, or the weak, or the little guy. Surely you can see this yourself in the Plame story?
You had a diplomat (NOT a trained surveillance gatherer) with a political agenda sitting in a hotel lobby drinking tea with other diplomats—and then coming back and saying that the British intelligence agency had it all wrong about
Iraq trying to obtain yellow cake. The British still stand by their story, by the way.
Of course Armitage didn’t do anything wrong—Valerie simply WAS NOT covert; her family knew she worked for the CIA, her friends knew, her mailman knew—heck, even her hair dresser knew for sure.
So why is the “Bush boys” wrong for making sure people knew what kind of character Joe Wilson was? He was writing letters to the editor saying Bush lied about the intelligence.
Ah well, Dave. It all comes down to whether or not we want to be honest with ourselves. The people calling themselves “democrats” nowadays are just the latest reincarnation of socialists who want to control us, elitists who think they’re smarter than us, and people who dislike mankind.
If anyone out there thinks this isn’t the case, then I invite you to pick an issue and we’ll see.
August 26th, 2007 at 10:01 am
Trying to leave no room for the observation that the same crowd that argue that she was not undercover, is the same crowd that argued that it was not one of their guys that “outed” her? Where was any reporting on this early on? You are saying the media is just as controlled as I am, just favoring you’re underdog, I am saying that the whole thing was a destraction to keep us busy and off the more hot stories like the downing street memo “fixed around the policy”
or the fact that the documents were forged on the yellowcake junk and the motivated source for alot of the reasoning to go after sad-dom and manage perceptions that he helped with 911
I sum up the whole last 8years with one sentence:
“Now our problems are your problems”
this was said to a new Jersey Cop who responded to concerned calls about 5 middle eastern looking young men celebrating the smoking towers and taking each other’s pictures in front of the smoldering WTC. Urban Mover’s in New Jersey was even reported in a 5 part series on FOX news on Israeli Spying in and on America/American’s
The mossad acourding to UPI (united press international) has even changed its policy to allow “targeted killings” in this country, so not only spying on whoever they want but killing whoever they want and its not murder its “Policy” one FBI guy interviewed says “this is a policy matter and we enforce federal law”; truely the israelies can do no wrong because it is policy.
In Carl Cammeron’s 5 part Fox series on Israelie spying a FBI guy is quoted saying ” I cant tell you about these israelis involvement with 911 its classified information”
CLEARLY there is more evidence that we should have attacked israel over 911 instead of sad-dom. They knew about it at least, or facilitated it at worst WITH miltary industrial/neocon/Project for a new American Century PNAC inside help and blessings.
911 and the never ending “War on Terror” inc. is either a “let it happen” on purpose event or a Make it happen event, the only question is who was involved besides some A-rab stoodges/patsies/double agents/informants that thought it was a sting operation like Oklahoma City eh New Republic subcribers?
(Pick your conspiracy theories along party lines and not any other criteria)
August 26th, 2007 at 10:12 am
Oh yeah, Iraq has their own deposits of Uranium(besides the D.U. residue) so why would he and his commanders provolk things by attempting to get it from Nigeria UNLESS it was a ruse to provolk attack? The whole thing is a double agent web of intrigue that is unknowable or one of Don Rummy(i luv methanol aspartame)
known unknowns or
Unknown Unknowns
because it is unknown if they have killed those that knew or had proof it was a ruse?
August 26th, 2007 at 10:16 am
Oh I forgot
THERE IS NO B-3 bohmer, where do these rumors get started?
Wag thuh dawg!
August 26th, 2007 at 11:50 am
If I bought in to this whole televised drama of the preforming inner party then I’d likely side with you on this one. You do put forth a good argument, however pointless your argument may be, it is still a good argument.
)) were only doing the same thing that they have been doing for decades. Entertaining You.
I do have to point out that those so-called agents (actors) and all of those politicians (also actors (like it or not
Television is a form of the media, along with magazines, newspapers, etc… and in order for those “Media Outlets” to become and/or remain successful, they must be entertaining.
How convenient to have big “political” events released to the “Media Outlets” that are constantly searching for “new” entertainment for the masses. Just stage a well scripted (even when true to the actors) “play” for the news people to go wild about. Of course this is the ticket when your doing something clandestine (like secretly operating under British rule for centuries) that you would like the public to remain uninformed about.
August 27th, 2007 at 5:09 pm
Yeah I get that sentiment and I have sorta bought into this diversion but I could not tell you hardly any of the “everybody knows that” of the rest of the bread and circuses the whole of the country is preoccupied and destracted with, who was it that broke what record on steroids last week again?
August 27th, 2007 at 6:18 pm
Me too, so I stopped to point those things out for my own sake as well as for the sake of others.
August 10th, 2008 at 10:05 am
"now our problems are your problems"
Now Bohm Iran dammit you goi sub humans!